Case Study Questions Class 10 Social Science Political Science Chapter 1 Power Sharing
CBSE Class 10 Case Study Questions Social Science Political Science Power Sharing. Important Case Study Questions for Class 10 Board Exam Students. Here we have arranged some Important Case Base Questions for students who are searching for Paragraph Based Questions Power Sharing.
At Case Study Questions there will given a Paragraph. In where some Important Questions will made on that respective Case Based Study. There will various types of marks will given 1 marks, 2 marks, 3 marks, 4 marks.
Case Study 1:
Belgium, a Western European nation, stands as a testament to the successful implementation of a democratic system in a diverse and multilingual society. Its political structure is characterized by federalism, granting significant autonomy to its regions and communities. The country has three official languages: Dutch, French, and German, reflecting its rich cultural tapestry. At the heart of Belgium’s democratic setup is a constitutional monarchy, where King Philippe holds a symbolic position, with real political power resting in the hands of elected representatives. Belgium’s federal parliament is bicameral, consisting of the Chamber of Representatives and the Senate.
The country’s unique system accommodates regional parliaments in Flanders, Wallonia, and Brussels, enabling decisions that respect linguistic and regional differences. Proportional representation ensures fair political participation, making Belgium an exemplary model of democratic governance amidst diversity.
Q1) How Belgium was able to avoid conflict between different communities living there? Mark 2
Answer The arrangement Belgium worked out is different from any other country and is very innovative. Here are some of the elements of the Belgian model-
Constitution prescribes that the number of Dutch and French speaking ministers shall be equal in the central government.
Many powers of the Central Government have been given to State Governments of the two regions of the country.
Brussels has a separate government in which both the communities have equal representation.
Q2) Define term civil war? Mark 2
Answer A violent conflict between opposing groups within a country that becomes so intense that it appears like a war.
Case Study 2:
Sri Lanka has grappled with a protracted community conflict, primarily between the Sinhalese majority and the Tamil minority. This multifaceted issue traces its roots back to historical grievances, ethnic tensions, and political complexities. The conflict, marked by a brutal civil war that lasted for nearly three decades, resulted in immense suffering and loss of life. While the armed conflict officially ended in 2009, deep-seated issues remain. Reconciliation efforts continue to address historical injustices, rebuild communities, and foster a sense of national unity. The path to lasting peace and harmony is complex, requiring a delicate balance of political will, social integration, and the recognition of diverse identities. Sri Lanka’s community conflict serves as a reminder of the challenges in reconciling historical wounds and forging a collective future, emphasizing the need for sustained efforts towards peace and coexistence.
Q1) How the concept of power sharing could have prevent civil war in Sri Lanka? Mark 2
Answer Power sharing could have helped in resolving conflict by following way-
Power sharing helps to reduce the possibility of conflict between social groups. Since social conflict often leads to violence and political instability, power sharing is a good way to ensure the stability of political order
Power sharing is the very spirit of democracy. A democratic rule involves sharing power with those affected by its exercise, and who have to live with its effects. People have a right to be consulted on how they are to be governed.
Q2) what was the role of India in Sri Lanka community conflict? Mark 2
Answer India has historically played a significant role in the Sri Lanka community conflict. In the 1980s and 1990s, India intervened militarily in support of Tamil separatists. Later, it supported peace initiatives and sought a diplomatic resolution to the conflict. India’s role continues to be influential in promoting stability and reconciliation in Sri Lanka.
Case Study 3:
Panchayati Raj, a decentralized system of local self-governance in India, is the cornerstone of grassroots democracy. Established by the 73rd Amendment Act in 1992, it empowers villages and small towns by devolving political, administrative, and financial authority to elected representatives at the Panchayat (local council) level. This system comprises three tiers: the Gram Panchayat (village level), Panchayat Samiti (block level), and Zila Parishad (district level). It aims to address local issues, promote rural development, and enhance citizen participation.
Panchayati Raj has not only improved service delivery and infrastructure but also empowered marginalized communities, particularly women and scheduled castes, in the decision-making process.
Over the years, Panchayati Raj has contributed to local development, social justice, and fostering a culture of democratic participation, making it an essential tool in India’s journey toward inclusive governance.
Q1) What kind of power sharing is demonstrated by Panchayati raj system in India? Mark 2
Answer Power can be shared among governments at different levels –
a general government for the entire country and governments at the provincial or regional level. Such a general government for the entire country is usually called federal government.
Q2) What are the benefits of having three tier governance in the country? Mark 1
Answer The benefits of Panchayati Raj in India include grassroots democracy, improved local governance, increased citizen participation, targeted rural development, empowerment of marginalized communities, and more efficient service delivery. It enhances transparency and accountability while ensuring that local needs and concerns are addressed effectively.
Q3) Mention some disadvantages of power sharing? Mark 1
Answer Delays decision making process ,Increase instability and indivisiness etc are some of the disadvantages of power sharing.
Case Study 4:
India, the world’s largest democracy, stands as a prime example of successful power sharing in a complex and diverse society. Its democratic structure is built on the principles of federalism, separation of powers, and decentralized governance. At the heart of India’s power sharing model is a multi-tiered system comprising the central government, state governments, and local self-governing bodies. This federal setup enables power to be distributed among various levels of authority, ensuring that regional and cultural diversities are respected and represented. The Indian Parliament embodies the separation of powers, with the executive, legislative, and judicial branches functioning independently to maintain checks and balances. Additionally, state governments hold significant authority over subjects in the State List, further enhancing power sharing.
Local self-governing institutions, known as Panchayats and Municipalities, play a pivotal role by devolving power to the grassroots level, promoting citizen participation, and addressing community-specific issues.
Q1) What are the types of power sharing practice by India? Mark 2
Answer India following different kind of power sharing mechanisms that are as below
Power sharing among different organs of government like legislature, executive and judiciary
Power sharing at different levels of government like Central Government, state government and local self government
Power sharing among different social groups
Power among political parties and pressure groups
Q2) Why power sharing is important in democracy? Mark 2
Answer Power sharing helps to reduce the possibility of conflict between social groups. Since social conflict often leads to violence and political instability, power sharing is a good way to ensure the stability of political order
Power sharing is the very spirit of democracy. A democratic rule involves sharing power with those affected by its exercise, and who have to live with its effects. People have a right to be consulted on how they are to be governed
Case Study 5:
Power sharing is a fundamental pillar of any thriving democracy, embodying the essence of representative government. It serves as a safeguard against the concentration of power in the hands of a few, ensuring that the voices and interests of diverse communities are heard and respected. Firstly, power sharing fosters inclusivity. It enables marginalized groups, minorities, and various political parties to participate in decision-making, preventing the dominance of a single group or individual. This fosters social cohesion and reduces the risk of conflicts in heterogeneous societies. Secondly, it promotes accountability and transparency. When power is distributed among different branches of government, each serves as a check on the other, reducing the likelihood of corruption and abuse of authority. In summary, power sharing is the bedrock of democratic stability and harmony, providing a framework where all citizens have a stake in their nation’s future, and no single entity holds absolute authority. It paves the way for a more just and equitable society.
Q1) How power sharing is practiced in India? Mark 2
Answer In India, power sharing is practiced through a federal system where authority is divided between the central government and individual states. The country also practices power sharing through its multi-party democracy, with regular elections allowing various political parties to share power based on popular mandate. Additionally, India has a system of reservations for historically marginalized communities, ensuring their participation in governance.
Q2) Write Advantages and disadvantages of power sharing? Mark 2
Answer
Advantages | Disadvantages |
Enhanced Decision-Making: Diverse perspectives lead to better decision-making. Power sharing allows for a wider range of ideas and solutions to be considered.
Protection of Rights: Power sharing can safeguard the rights of minority groups and protect them from discrimination or oppression by the majority. |
Slow Decision-Making: Power sharing can sometimes lead to slow and cumbersome decision-making processes, especially in situations where consensus is hard to achieve.
Conflict and Gridlock: In some cases, power-sharing arrangements may lead to political gridlock or disputes between different levels of government, hindering progress. |
Also See: Geography Chapter Resources and Development Case Based Questions