Essay – Best for an individual is not necessarily best for the society
Best for an individual is not necessarily best for the society Essay: Aristotle, the legendary Greek philosopher of 6 CE professed, “Man is by nature a social animal, an individual who is unsocial naturally and not accidentally is beneath our notice or more than human.” The Greek philosopher and political scientist signified that human beings are inherently conditioned to live in organized societies in contradiction to the nomadic life of tribes like Bedouins. As such it is natural that the interests of every individual dwelling in a society are to be taken into consideration while drafting policies and guidelines for the administration of any particular society.
Discussion
History is etched with political events that adhered to the directions of a single man or a group of a particular ethnicity that culminated in the destruction of material wealth as well as the unprecedented magnitude of human loss. Personalities such as Adolf Hitler and Joseph Stalin are evidence of the undeniable negative impacts on society when the interest of a single individual is taken into consideration. Hitler was motivated to reinstate Germany’s glorious status on the Global stage as it cherished before the signing of the Versailles Treaty on 28 June 1919 after World War I. However, Hitler was a fanatic about the racial supremacy of the Aryan race, who according to him played the most crucial role in Germany’s illustrious history. In contradiction, Hitler believed the Jews who were associated with trade, commerce in general and money lending in particular were the cause of Germany’s downfall from greatness. The interests of one individual who posed as the ‘Fuhrer’ or the “Father of the Nation’ turned out to be the Dictator who led to the largest genocide in human history.
India has been the breeding ground of the culture of diversity and pluralistic diversity, which beliefs in a collective and interdependent existence rather than taking a single individual’s or a single group’s interests as the primary aim of a nation. India has sheltered various religions such as Hindu, Islam, Sikh, Zoroastrian, and Jews as equals with equal rights and opportunities. The Indian constitution acknowledges and identifies India as a secular nation by the 72nd amendment in 1976. The Fundamental Rights enshrined in part II, Articles 21-26 grant every citizen the enjoy their rights without hindering the rights of others. The constitution also makes every Indian citizen equal before the Rule of Law giving citizens the right to move the law in case of violations of their rights.
Conclusion
To conclude, the best interest of one individual can prove to be detrimental to the whole of society as a testament to the era of Nazi Germany under the leadership of Adolf Hitler. In contradiction, India is the epitome of collective existence with pluralistic identities. The interest of the entire society, be it a stratified society based on caste, creed, religion, gender, racial background and social status all equal before the rule of law. Thus India proves to be the largest and most successful democracy in the world.
FAQs
Q1. When did India become secular?
Ans: Indian constitution acknowledges and identifies India as a secular nation by the 72nd amendment in 1976.
Q2. Which articles are concerned with Fundamental Rights?
Ans: The Fundamental Rights enshrined in part II, Articles 21-26 grant every citizen the enjoy their rights without hindering the rights of others.
For more updates follow our net explanations homepage